AI Document Editor for Legal Teams
Legal work is document work. Every brief, contract, and memo represents hours of research, analysis, and drafting. Vespper gives legal teams an editor where AI assistance comes with the traceability and citation rigor the profession demands.
1. Professional Responsibility Standards
Legal teams must ensure all document workflows comply with ethical rules governing the practice of law.
ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct
- Model Rule 1.1 competence obligation including Comment 8 on technology competence
- Model Rule 1.6 client confidentiality as applied to AI-assisted drafting and cloud storage
- Model Rules 5.1 and 5.3 supervisory obligations for review of AI-generated work product
State Bar Ethical Rules
- Jurisdiction-specific opinions on AI tool use in legal practice
- Duty to inform clients about AI use in work product where required
- CLE requirements for technology competence adopted by state bars
- Using AI tools without confidentiality safeguards may breach Model Rule 1.6 obligations
- Failure to supervise AI-generated work product creates exposure under Model Rules 5.1 and 5.3
2. Court & Regulatory Filing Requirements
Legal teams manage filings across courts and agencies, each with distinct formatting and deadline requirements.
Filing Rules and Deadlines
- Jurisdiction-specific formatting requirements for motions, briefs, and pleadings
- Filing deadline calculation including court holidays, electronic filing cutoffs, and mailbox rules
- CM/ECF electronic filing system requirements and attorney registration obligations
Regulatory Agency Submissions
- SEC EDGAR formatting requirements for registration statements and periodic reports
- USPTO filing standards including patent application formatting and maintenance fee schedules
- Agency-specific submission portal requirements and comment period tracking
- Missed filing deadlines can result in default judgments or loss of patent priority dates
- Non-compliant formatting leads to filing rejection during which deadlines may expire
3. Document Retention & Privilege
Legal teams must protect privileged communications and comply with preservation obligations throughout the document lifecycle.
Litigation Hold and Privilege
- Duty to preserve ESI upon reasonable anticipation of litigation
- Privilege review protocols for documents shared with AI tools or cloud platforms
- Work product doctrine protections for attorney mental impressions and strategy documents
- Defensible destruction protocols that suspend during litigation holds
- Spoliation from inadequate litigation holds can result in adverse inference instructions or sanctions
- Privilege waiver from sharing documents with AI tools may not be recoverable under FRE 502
4. Data Security & Privacy
Legal teams handle sensitive client information requiring security measures meeting professional responsibility standards.
ABA Formal Opinion 477R
- Reasonable efforts requirement for protecting client information in electronic communications
- Factor-based analysis for determining appropriate security measures
- Obligation to vet cloud service providers and AI tools used with client data
Data Breach and Privacy
- State data breach notification requirements for law firm incidents
- GDPR and CCPA compliance for client personal information handling
- Cross-border data transfer restrictions for international client data
- Data breaches trigger both regulatory notification and potential bar disciplinary proceedings
- Using AI tools without security vetting may violate ABA Formal Opinion 477R reasonable efforts standard
5. AI-Assisted Research & Citation
Legal teams using AI tools must ensure accuracy and meet emerging disclosure requirements.
Citation and AI Disclosure
- Duty to verify all AI-generated citations and case holdings before filing
- Emerging court-specific AI-assisted content disclosure requirements
- Responsibility for AI-generated content under Rule 11 regardless of tool used
- Bluebook and court-specific citation format compliance
- Filing fabricated AI-generated citations has resulted in sanctions, fines, and disciplinary referrals
- Failure to comply with AI disclosure requirements may violate candor obligations to the tribunal
What happens when documentation falls short
- Disciplinary action from state bar for ethical violations related to technology use
- Malpractice claims from document errors, missed deadlines, or unverified AI content
- Privilege waiver from improper document handling or AI tool vetting failures
- Court sanctions for non-compliant filings or AI disclosure requirement violations
- Data breach liability affecting client confidentiality across multiple jurisdictions
What this means for your team
How Vespper serves legal teams
Source-connected legal writing
Upload case law, statutes, contracts, and discovery documents. Vespper drafts with every argument tied to the authority you provide.
Citation integrity
Every citation in your document links to an uploaded source document — not AI-generated references. If it's cited, it's real.
Diff-based review
Review every AI-suggested edit in diff view before accepting. See exactly what changed, with the context of why.
Matter-organized workspaces
Keep all documents, sources, and drafts organized by matter with consistent access control and revision history.
How legal teams use Vespper
Upload case materials and references
Connect case files, precedent cases, clause libraries, opposing counsel filings, and other matter documents.
Draft with AI assistance
Generate briefs, contracts, or memos with arguments and provisions traced to your uploaded source materials.
Review and finalize
Review every AI suggestion in diff view, verify citations, refine the prose, and export in the required format.
Built for
Related solutions
The document editor legal teams trust
Draft legal documents with AI that cites what you give it — not what it invents.
Sign in