AI Legal Brief Generator
Legal briefs require precise argumentation backed by case law, statutes, and factual evidence. Vespper helps you draft briefs with every argument traced to its supporting authority, so you never cite a case you haven't verified.
1. Court Filing Requirements
Every brief must conform to the procedural rules of the court in which it is filed, including formatting, page limits, and filing method.
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP)
- Rules 7-12 governing motion practice including format, content, and timing requirements
- Rule 56 summary judgment brief requirements including statement of undisputed facts
- Local court rules for page/word limits, font size, margin requirements, and cover page format
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP)
- Rules 28-32 governing appellate brief structure, content, and length limitations
- Certificate of compliance with word-count limits and typeface requirements
- Appendix and record excerpt requirements with proper record citation format
Electronic Filing Requirements
- CM/ECF system compliance including PDF formatting and filing conventions
- Electronic signature requirements and attorney registration obligations
- Filing deadline calculation including electronic filing cutoff times per jurisdiction
- Briefs rejected for formatting non-compliance can miss filing deadlines with no extension available
- Word count violations are grounds for striking the brief and refusing consideration
2. Citation Standards
Legal citations must precisely identify authority and conform to the citation format required by the court.
The Bluebook (21st Edition)
- Case citation format including parallel citations where required by state courts
- Statutory citation format with proper code, section, and supplement year references
- Short-form citation rules for subsequent references within the same document
Court-Specific Citation Requirements
- ALWD Guide to Legal Citation as alternative format accepted in some jurisdictions
- Vendor-neutral citation formats adopted by specific state courts
- Record and appendix citation conventions per court-specific rules
- Incorrect citations undermine credibility and may trigger court inquiry into counsel's competence
- Failure to provide parallel citations where required violates local rules and may result in filing rejection
3. Standards of Review
Each legal argument must be framed under the correct standard of review, which determines the level of deference given to the lower court or agency.
Appellate Standards
- De novo review for questions of law — no deference to lower court's legal conclusions
- Abuse of discretion standard for procedural and evidentiary rulings
- Clearly erroneous standard for factual findings in bench trials
- Substantial evidence review for administrative agency proceedings
- Applying the wrong standard of review misframes the entire argument and wastes court resources
- Failure to identify the standard of review is a common basis for summary affirmance
4. Ethical Obligations
Attorneys filing briefs have specific ethical obligations that constrain the content and arguments that may be presented.
Rule 11 (FRCP) — Certification Requirements
- Every filing certifies that legal contentions are warranted by existing law or non-frivolous argument for change
- Factual contentions must have evidentiary support or be specifically identified as likely to have support after discovery
- Sanctions exposure including attorney fees for Rule 11 violations
Model Rules 3.3 and 3.4
- Rule 3.3 candor toward the tribunal — duty to disclose adverse authority within controlling jurisdiction
- Rule 3.4 fairness to opposing party — prohibition on suppressing evidence or making frivolous discovery objections
- Duty to correct false statements of material fact or law previously made to the tribunal
- Failure to cite known adverse authority within the controlling jurisdiction is an ethical violation regardless of outcome
- Rule 11 sanctions have been imposed for filing briefs with AI-generated citations that were not verified
5. Brief Structure Requirements
Courts expect briefs to follow established structural conventions that facilitate judicial review and decision-making.
Required Brief Components
- Statement of issues presented with precise framing of legal questions
- Statement of the case including procedural history and relevant facts with record citations
- Summary of argument providing a roadmap of the analytical framework
- Argument section with point headings conforming to local rules and corresponding to issues presented
- Arguments not raised in the statement of issues may be deemed waived on appeal
- Point headings must be argumentative propositions, not neutral topic labels
What happens when documentation falls short
- Court sanctions under Rule 11 for frivolous arguments or unverified factual contentions
- Brief rejection and potential deadline default from non-compliance with local court rules
- Malpractice liability from missed filing deadlines or citation errors affecting case outcome
- Adverse inference from failure to cite controlling adverse authority
- Appellate waiver of arguments not properly preserved or raised in the statement of issues
What this means for your team
How Vespper helps with legal briefs
Case file integration
Upload case files, discovery documents, deposition transcripts, and prior filings. Vespper drafts arguments connected to your actual case materials.
Authority-linked arguments
Every legal argument in your brief cites the specific case, statute, or regulation it relies on — with the citation linked to the uploaded source.
Structured brief output
Generate briefs following court-standard structure: statement of facts, argument sections, standard of review, and conclusion.
Revision with tracked changes
Refine arguments with AI assistance and review every modification in diff view before accepting — maintaining a complete edit history.
Draft your legal brief in 3 steps
Upload case materials
Connect case files, relevant case law, statutes, discovery documents, and prior filings as source documents.
Generate brief draft
Vespper drafts your brief with structured arguments, each traced to the supporting authority and factual evidence you uploaded.
Review and file
Review every argument and citation, refine the prose, verify authorities, and export in the required court format.
Built for
Related solutions
Start drafting legal briefs with AI
Draft well-argued legal briefs with every citation traced to real authority.
Sign in